high · 7.4 Patched

IzPack has Path Traversal in UnpackerBase that allows writing files outside the installation directory via malicious pack entries

CVE-2026-54550 · GHSA-f63g-88cj-hjf9 · published 26 Aug 2026

How serious is it

  • Severity: high, CVSS score 7.4 out of 10.
  • No exploit prediction (EPSS) score yet.
  • Not on the CISA list of exploited vulnerabilities.
  • No public exploit in Exploit-DB.

Is your app affected by CVE-2026-54550?

Paste this prompt into Claude Code, Cursor or any AI coding tool: it runs a free Shippable scan of your project and fixes what it finds. Built with Lovable, Bolt or v0? Scan your live app. Or upload your package file.

Who is affected

  • org.codehaus.izpack:izpack-installer (Maven) < 5.2.7

How to check

  1. Look for org.codehaus.izpack:izpack-installer in your lockfile and compare its version with the range above.
  2. Or paste your lockfile into the checker: it lists every package with a known vulnerability, this one included.

How to fix

Copies a prompt for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex: it checks your lockfiles for this and upgrades it.
  1. Upgrade org.codehaus.izpack:izpack-installer to 5.2.7 or later, commit the lockfile and redeploy.
  2. If a vulnerable version was live, check your logs and rotate the secrets that server could read.

The advisory

### Summary IzPack's `UnpackerBase.unpack()` resolves pack-file target paths without any canonical-path or directory-containment check. An attacker who distributes a trojanized installer JAR (the format is unsigned) can include pack entries whose `targetPath` contains `../` sequences. When a victim runs the installer the file is written to an attacker-chosen location on disk under the victim's privileges — including startup folders, PATH directories, or system locations. ### Details **Vulnerable method:** `com.izforge.izpack.installer.unpacker.UnpackerBase.unpack()` **Source file:** `izpack-installer/src/main/java/com/izforge/izpack/installer/unpacker/UnpackerBase.java` **Vulnerable lines (5.2.4):** ~618–627 The relevant code path is: ```java String targetPath = packFile.getTargetPath(); // attacker-controlled String path = IoHelper.translatePath(targetPath, variables); // separator swap ONLY File target = new File(path); // no canonical check // ... mkdirs() then file is written to `target` ``` `IoHelper.translatePath()` (source: `izpack-util/.../IoHelper.java`) performs **only** file-separator character conversion (`'/'` ↔ `File.separatorChar`) and contains no security validation whatsoever. There is no call to `getCanonicalPath()`, no `startsWith(installDir)` containment check, and no normalisation of `..` segments. Because IzPack installer JARs carry **no digital signature**, an attacker can repack any legitimate installer with malicious `PackFile` entries. The file format is a standard ZIP with serialised resources — no integrity protection. **Confirmed unpatched in HEAD (fetched from GitHub, 2025):** ``` git show HEAD:izpack-installer/src/main/java/com/izforge/izpack/installer/unpacker/UnpackerBase.java \ | grep -n 'getCanonicalPath\|startsWith.*install\|traversal' # (no output — fix not present) ``` ### PoC ```bash # 1. Clone IzPack source and view the vulnerable code directly git clone --depth=1 --branch izpack-5.2.4 https://github.com/izpack/izpack.git sed -n '615,650p' izpack/izpack-installer/src/main/java/com/izforge/izpack/installer/unpacker/UnpackerBase.java # 2. Compile and run the following Java reproducer (no IzPack classpath needed): ``` ```java // TestPathTraversal.java import java.io.*; public class TestPathTraversal { // Exact replication of IoHelper.translatePath() — separator swap, no security static String translatePath(String destination) { return destination.replace('/', File.separatorChar); } public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { String installDir = "/tmp/izpack_install"; String maliciousPath = installDir + "/../../../tmp/ESCAPED_FILE"; // This is what UnpackerBase does: String path = translatePath(maliciousPath); File target = new File(path); // resolves traversal target.getParentFile().mkdirs(); try (FileWriter fw = new FileWriter(target)) { fw.write("Written outside install dir via IzPack path traversal\n"); } System.out.println("File written to: " + target.getCanonicalPath()); System.out.println("Inside installDir: " + target.getCanonicalPath().startsWith(new File(installDir).getCanonicalPath())); } } ``` ```bash javac TestPathTraversal.java && java TestPathTraversal # Output: File written to: /tmp/ESCAPED_FILE # Inside installDir: false ``` ### Impact Any user who runs an IzPack-generated installer is affected. The attacker only needs to distribute a repackaged installer — a common social-engineering vector. On Windows (the primary IzPack platform) the victim typically runs the installer as a local administrator, so the attacker can write to `%APPDATA%\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Startup`, `%SystemRoot%\System32`, or any other location reachable by the victim user. On Linux/macOS the same applies for user-writable locations. No authentication, no special privileges and no interaction beyond running the installer are required on the victim side. ### Credits This issue was identified by Michał Majchrowicz, Marcin Wyczechowski, and Paweł Zdunek, members of the AFINE Team.

Check your whole app

Dependencies are only half of it. Free and read-only: before you push, run npx shippable-dev scan localhost:3000 in your project folder, no account needed. For your live app, you prove it's yours with a one-line tag first.

References

Merged from GitHub Advisory Database, OSV. Last updated 28 Oct 2026. All vulnerabilities · RSS · JSON