high · 7.8 Patched

containerd CRI plugin: Checkpoint restore bypasses destination security context

CVE-2026-95837 · GHSA-p7v4-vr35-mj6f · GO-2026-6791 · published 15 Oct 2026

How serious is it

  • Severity: high, CVSS score 7.8 out of 10.
  • No exploit prediction (EPSS) score yet.
  • Not on the CISA list of exploited vulnerabilities.
  • No public exploit in Exploit-DB.

Is your app affected by CVE-2026-95837?

Paste this prompt into Claude Code, Cursor or any AI coding tool: it runs a free Shippable scan of your project and fixes what it finds. Built with Lovable, Bolt or v0? Scan your live app. Or upload your package file.

Who is affected

  • github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 (Go) >= 2.1.0, < 2.2.7
  • github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 (Go) >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.4

How to check

  1. Run go list -m github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 in your project to see the installed version, including copies pulled in by other packages.
  2. Or paste your lockfile into the checker: it lists every package with a known vulnerability, this one included.

How to fix

Copies a prompt for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex: it checks your lockfiles for this and upgrades it.
  1. On >= 2.1.0, < 2.2.7: Upgrade github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 to 2.2.7 or later, commit the lockfile and redeploy.
  2. On >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.4: Upgrade github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 to 2.3.4 or later, commit the lockfile and redeploy.
  3. If a vulnerable version was live, check your logs and rotate the secrets that server could read.

The advisory

### Impact A vulnerability in containerd's CRI implementation allows a container restored from an untrusted checkpoint via the `CreateContainer` API to bypass the destination security context and execute with elevated privileges. When restoring a container from a checkpoint archive or annotated OCI image, CRIU restores process credentials, Linux capabilities, `no_new_privs`, and seccomp state directly from checkpoint data rather than enforcing the destination CRI `ContainerConfig`. An attacker who can run a container with a crafted checkpoint image can execute processes as root with full capabilities and no enforced seccomp filters despite restrictive security policies requested by the orchestrator. Additionally, containerd's CRI status reporting reflects the requested configuration rather than the actual restored process state, masking the privilege discrepancy from orchestrators. This issue affects Linux systems running containerd with CRI checkpoint restore enabled; users not utilizing CRI checkpoint restore are not affected. ### Patches This bug has been addressed in containerd 2.2.7 and 2.3.4 by disabling checkpoint restore via `CreateContainer` by default. The feature has been removed entirely in containerd 2.4.0. Users should update to these versions to resolve the issue. Running containers that were restored from untrusted checkpoints should be stopped, deleted, and recreated. Users who rely on restore via the `CreateContainer` API can re-enable the feature by setting the new `enable_experimental_restore_via_create` configuration option. However, enabling restore via `CreateContainer` leaves this vulnerability present, as containerd cannot enforce destination security policy during CRIU process restoration. ### Workarounds On unpatched versions, containerd does not provide a configuration option to disable checkpoint restore via `CreateContainer`. Deployments should restrict container creation permissions to trusted users, validate container image registries, or use admission controllers to reject images containing checkpoint data. ### References * [CRIU image security](https://checkpoint-restore.github.io/criu/security/image-security.html) ### Credits The containerd project would like to thank @l2yyd5 and @berkpolatCE for responsibly disclosing this issue in accordance with the [containerd security policy](https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/main/SECURITY.md). ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in [containerd](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/issues/new/choose) * Email us at [security@containerd.io](mailto:security@containerd.io) To report a security issue in containerd: * [Report a new vulnerability](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/security/advisories/new) * Email us at [security@containerd.io](mailto:security@containerd.io)

Check your whole app

Dependencies are only half of it. Free and read-only: before you push, run npx shippable-dev scan localhost:3000 in your project folder, no account needed. For your live app, you prove it's yours with a one-line tag first.

References

Merged from GitHub Advisory Database, OSV. Last updated 23 Oct 2026. All vulnerabilities · RSS · JSON