high · 8.2 Patched

Pillow PDF append accepts malformed shared page-tree DAG causing resource exhaustion

CVE-2026-96640 · GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2 · published 22 Oct 2026

How serious is it

  • Severity: high, CVSS score 8.2 out of 10.
  • No exploit prediction (EPSS) score yet.
  • Not on the CISA list of exploited vulnerabilities.
  • No public exploit in Exploit-DB.

Is your app affected by CVE-2026-96640?

Paste this prompt into Claude Code, Cursor or any AI coding tool: it runs a free Shippable scan of your project and fixes what it finds. Built with Lovable, Bolt or v0? Scan your live app. Or upload your package file.

Who is affected

  • Pillow (PyPI) >= 5.1.0, < 13.0.0

How to check

  1. Run pip show Pillow in your project to see the installed version, including copies pulled in by other packages.
  2. Or paste your lockfile into the checker: it lists every package with a known vulnerability, this one included.
  3. Or run npx shippable-dev scan localhost:3000 in your project folder. It reads your lockfile and flags this vulnerability along with every other known one.

How to fix

Copies a prompt for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex: it checks your lockfiles for this and upgrades it.
  1. Upgrade Pillow to 13.0.0 or later, commit the lockfile and redeploy.
  2. If a vulnerable version was live, check your logs and rotate the secrets that server could read.

The advisory

### Summary Pillow's documented PDF append path can spend disproportionate CPU time on a compact malformed PDF page tree. An attacker who can supply an existing PDF to an application that appends an image with `Image.save(..., format="PDF", append=True)` can provide a malformed `/Pages` tree where each level repeats the same child `/Pages` reference in `/Kids`. Pillow treats the graph as a tree and expands each repeated reference in `PdfParser.linearize_page_tree()` without tracking visited or duplicate indirect references. In the bounded proof below, a `1410`-byte PDF expands to `8192` page references from one distinct page object and takes about `9.6` seconds through the append path. A comparable linear control with the same depth stays at one page reference and completes in about `0.02` seconds. This is in scope for Pillow's security policy because it is reproducible in `main`, affects the latest public release tested (`12.3.0`), and is not just an unexpected Python exception. The vulnerable operation accepts attacker-controlled PDF bytes through Pillow's PDF parser and causes deterministic resource consumption before normal completion. ### Details #### Affected versions - Package: `Pillow` - Ecosystem: `pip` / PyPI - Affected component: `src/PIL/PdfParser.py` page-tree traversal reached from `src/PIL/PdfImagePlugin.py` PDF append handling - Runtime-tested affected release: `12.3.0` - Runtime-tested affected development version: `13.0.0.dev0` - Tested commit: `b39b9649312fbc381060e8c7c7f9f0de4cc63daa` - Current source artifact hash: `sha256(git archive --format=tar HEAD) = 2ccefca23d432456765be8d3c34564c65ba016b0c9da1e44ca389762f7eda054` - Release `12.3.0` commit: `bb1d8e8ab8d29048624d96e3ee53cecf7c13d13d` - Release `12.3.0` source artifact hash: `sha256(git archive --format=tar 12.3.0) = 94bed33fd20123938dbc0153d295250bb4e3c09251b6d4a34f7595e25d409c81` - Source-level affected: `5.1.0`, `12.2.0`, `12.3.0`, and `HEAD` - Likely affected range: `>= 5.1.0` - Patched versions: none known Evidence fact strings: - Runtime-tested affected: 12.3.0 - Runtime-tested affected: 13.0.0.dev0 at b39b9649312fbc381060e8c7c7f9f0de4cc63daa - Source-level affected: 5.1.0 - Source-level affected: 12.2.0 - Source-level affected: HEAD - Likely affected range: >= 5.1.0, no fixed version known - Pre-boundary note: 5.0.0 has PdfImagePlugin.py but no src/PIL/PdfParser.py `5.0.0` contains `src/PIL/PdfImagePlugin.py` but does not contain `src/PIL/PdfParser.py`. `PdfParser.py` was introduced by `6207b44ab1ff4a91d8ddc7579619876d0bb191a4` (`2018-01-18 issue #2959: support appending to existing PDFs`), which shipped in `5.1.0`. #### Technical details The reachable path is: 1. A service or application receives an attacker-influenced existing PDF and appends an image using Pillow's public PDF save path: ```python Image.new("L", (1, 1), 0).save(existing_pdf_file, format="PDF", append=True) ``` 2. `src/PIL/PdfImagePlugin.py` routes `append=True` to `PdfParser`: ```python is_appending = im.encoderinfo.get("append", False) filename_str = filename.decode() if isinstance(filename, bytes) else filename if is_appending: existing_pdf = PdfParser.PdfParser(f=fp, filename=filename_str, mode="r+b") else: existing_pdf = PdfParser.PdfParser(f=fp, filename=filename_str, mode="w+b") ``` 3. `src/PIL/PdfParser.py` parses the existing PDF and linearizes the page tree: ```python self.page_tree_root = self.read_indirect(self.pages_ref) self.pages = self.linearize_page_tree(self.page_tree_root) self.orig_pages = self.pages[:] ``` 4. `linearize_page_tree()` recursively follows every `/Kids` entry and extends the page list. It does not track page-tree node identity, duplicate references, or active traversal references: ```python def linearize_page_tree( self, node: PdfDict | None = None ) -> list[IndirectReference]: page_node = node if node is not None else self.page_tree_root check_format_condition( page_node[b"Type"] == b"Pages", "/Type of page tree node is not /Pages" ) pages = [] for kid in page_node[b"Kids"]: kid_object = self.read_indirect(kid) if kid_object[b"Type"] == b"Page": pages.append(kid) else: pages.extend(self.linearize_page_tree(node=kid_object)) return pages ``` 5. During append, `rewrite_pages()` then iterates the expanded `orig_pages` list and scans/replaces entries in `self.pages`, adding more cost to the already expanded duplicate-reference list. The missing invariant is: ```text The PDF page tree should be treated as an acyclic tree of unique indirect references before Pillow builds pages/orig_pages or rewrites pages. ``` The proof intentionally uses a malformed PDF page-tree DAG: each `/Pages` node repeats the same next `/Pages` child reference twice. Pillow accepts this graph and expands it as if the repeated reference represented distinct subtrees. ### PoC Environment used for validation: - OS/runtime: Linux, Python `3.13.11` - Current tested build: Pillow `13.0.0.dev0`, commit `b39b9649312fbc381060e8c7c7f9f0de4cc63daa` - Latest release tested: Pillow `12.3.0` - The proof uses only synthetic in-memory PDFs and does not contact the network. Save this as `poc_pillow_pdf_page_tree_dag.py`: ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 from __future__ import annotations import io import json import sys import time from PIL import Image, PdfParser import PIL def make_page_tree_pdf(depth: int, fanout: int) -> bytes: if fanout not in (1, 2): raise ValueError("fanout must be 1 or 2") objects: list[bytes] = [b"<< /Type /Catalog /Pages 2 0 R >>"] for object_id in range(2, depth + 3): next_id = object_id + 1 kids = b" ".join(f"{next_id} 0 R".encode("ascii") for _ in range(fanout)) parent = b"" if object_id == 2 else f" /Parent {object_id - 1} 0 R".encode() objects.append…

Check your whole app

Dependencies are only half of it. Free and read-only: before you push, run npx shippable-dev scan localhost:3000 in your project folder, no account needed. For your live app, you prove it's yours with a one-line tag first.

References

Merged from GitHub Advisory Database, OSV. Last updated 25 Oct 2026. All vulnerabilities · RSS · JSON