high · 8.8

scsi: qla2xxx: Serialize NVMe unsol ctx list with a per-fcport lock

CVE-2026-97527 · published 25 Sept 2026

How serious is it

  • Severity: high, CVSS score 8.8 out of 10.
  • No exploit prediction (EPSS) score yet.
  • Not on the CISA list of exploited vulnerabilities.
  • No public exploit in Exploit-DB.

Is your app affected by CVE-2026-97527?

Paste this prompt into Claude Code, Cursor or any AI coding tool: it runs a free Shippable scan of your project and fixes what it finds. Built with Lovable, Bolt or v0? Scan your live app. Or upload your package file.

Who is affected

  • Linux Linux: 875386b98857822b77ac7f95bdf367b70af5b78c to < 6c71726cdfda93ae169a75c7b1697eb870303125, 875386b98857822b77ac7f95bdf367b70af5b78c to < c1ee12eecbab9674fb73c9e00a93fac655d5a5dc, 875386b98857822b77ac7f95bdf367b70af5b78c to < b211d138cad86f749826d6132db6388eded992d8, 875386b98857822b77ac7f95bdf367b70af5b78c to < 4d8ad6bc8cc5eff1870cef00a0d611f38f8b6bd0
  • Linux Linux: 6.6

How to check

  1. Find out whether you run the affected product and which version, then compare it with the versions above.

How to fix

Copies a prompt for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex that asks it to check whether you run this product.
  1. Apply the vendor's update or mitigation from the references below. If there is none yet, limit exposure of the affected service until there is.
  2. If a vulnerable version was live, check your logs and rotate the secrets that server could read.

The advisory

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: qla2xxx: Serialize NVMe unsol ctx list with a per-fcport lock The fcport->unsol_ctx_head list is modified from several contexts without a common lock. Entries are added in qla2xxx_process_purls_iocb() from the response queue ISR (under the qpair qp_lock), while they are removed from qla2xxx_process_purls_pkt() (DPC/purex worker), qla_nvme_xmt_ls_rsp() (NVMe-FC transport callback) and qla_nvme_release_lsrsp_cmd_kref() (SRB completion). The qpair qp_lock cannot serialize this per-fcport list since multiqueue adapters add entries through different qpairs, so a concurrent add and delete (or two concurrent deletes) can corrupt the list pointers. Introduce a dedicated per-fcport spinlock, unsol_ctx_lock, initialized in qla2x00_alloc_fcport(), and take it around every list_add_tail()/list_del() on unsol_ctx_head. The add nests under the existing qp_lock; no delete path takes qp_lock, so the lock order is consistent and deadlock free.

Check your whole app

Dependencies are only half of it. Free and read-only: before you push, run npx shippable-dev scan localhost:3000 in your project folder, no account needed. For your live app, you prove it's yours with a one-line tag first.

References

Merged from CVE List. Last updated 26 Oct 2026. All vulnerabilities · RSS · JSON