In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: namespace: queue a mount only once for mount notifications mnt_noti…
CVE-2026-98991 · GHSA-4qhh-mf87-xrfm · EUVD-2026-108785 · published 23 Oct 2026
How serious is it
- Severity: high, CVSS score 7.8 out of 10.
- No exploit prediction (EPSS) score yet.
- Not on the CISA list of exploited vulnerabilities.
- No public exploit in Exploit-DB.
Is your app affected by CVE-2026-98991?
Paste this prompt into Claude Code, Cursor or any AI coding tool: it runs a free Shippable scan of your project and fixes what it finds. Built with Lovable, Bolt or v0? Scan your live app. Or upload your package file.
Who is affected
- Linux Linux: 6.15
- Linux Linux: bf630c40164162ba1d3933c2f5e3397d083e0948 <bd2feb7796b6585938a4241e7b7c4148a6f7b762
- Linux Linux: patch: 7.2.11
- Linux Linux: patch: 0
- Linux Linux: patch: 7.3
- Linux Linux: bf630c40164162ba1d3933c2f5e3397d083e0948 <702ff3fe499876e09c45558a05366d21a5bc41ab
- Linux Linux: patch: 6.18.57
- Linux Linux: bf630c40164162ba1d3933c2f5e3397d083e0948 <acbe9e4418e2ef7bef1a12e62e0e7d6145a15190
How to check
- Find out whether you run the affected product and which version, then compare it with the versions above.
How to fix
Copies a prompt for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex that asks it to check whether you run this product.
- Apply the vendor's update or mitigation from the references below. If there is none yet, limit exposure of the affected service until there is.
- If a vulnerable version was live, check your logs and rotate the secrets that server could read.
The advisory
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
namespace: queue a mount only once for mount notifications
mnt_notify_add() puts a mount on notify_list. It doesn't check whether
the mount is on the list already. That's fine as long as every mount is
queued at most once per namespace_sem hold. It isn't.
propagate_umount() moves a surviving overmount off a stack of mounts
that are going away and queues it as moved. shrink_submounts() and
mark_mounts_for_expiry() call umount_tree() for several mounts under a
single namespace_sem hold. So the second umount_tree() can take down
exactly the mount the first one reparented, reparent it once more and so
end up queueing it a second time.
The second list_add_tail() cuts the mounts queued in between out of the
list while the head still points at the last of them. notify_mnt_list()
then only visits that one mount and the others are freed after the grace
period with notify_list still pointing at them. Every later mount
operation on the host walks freed memory:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __list_add_valid_or_report
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881003d57e0 by task notify_dq/162
__list_add_valid_or_report+0x15c/0x1a0
mnt_add_to_ns+0x322/0x890
attach_recursive_mnt.isra.0+0xf2a/0x1a00
path_mount+0x139c/0x1d40
This needs a mount with MNT_SHRINKABLE to bind from. That's what
finish_automount() creates (submounts of NFS, AFS and CIFS and the
tracefs mount below debugfs). Bind mounts inherit the flag. A mount
namespace with a FAN_MARK_MNTNS mark does the rest and root in a user
namespace can have both.
Initialize to_notify in alloc_vfsmnt() and leave a mount alone that is
queued already. mnt_notify() looks at the state the mount has when the
list is drained so a single entry per mount is enough. The move event
for a mount that is unmounted under the same hold is lost. That's fine.
The detach is what matters.
Check your whole app
Dependencies are only half of it. Free and read-only: before you push, run npx shippable-dev scan localhost:3000 in your project folder, no account needed. For your live app, you prove it's yours with a one-line tag first.
References
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/acbe9e4418e2ef7bef1a12e62e0e7d6145a15190
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/702ff3fe499876e09c45558a05366d21a5bc41ab
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd2feb7796b6585938a4241e7b7c4148a6f7b762
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98991
Merged from ENISA EUVD. Last updated 25 Oct 2026. All vulnerabilities · RSS · JSON